This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PCH [Was: Re: Target FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE question]
- To: Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>
- Subject: Re: PCH [Was: Re: Target FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE question]
- From: Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 02:38:22 -0400
- Cc: dewar at gnat dot com, geoffk at geoffk dot org, neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010702054103.24077F2A8C@nile.gnat.com><87r8vzc0mv.fsf@cgsoftware.com>
Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com> writes:
> As I said then, it took more time to compile 3% of something like
> kdelibs (one source dir) without PCH than it did to compile all of the
> sources files with PCH on.
Of course, while a 33x speedup would be nice, it's not what happened.
:)
I meant 12%.
Dunno what cognitive disconnect caused me to type 3.
--
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the
precipitate.
"-Steven Wright