This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Target FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE question

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: Target FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE question
From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:53:27 +0100

Richard Henderson wrote:-

> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:21:48PM +0100, Neil Booth wrote:
> > My inclination is to stick with an "int" in the function prototype,
> > rather than a "HOST_WIDE_INT", which seems like overkill.  Is this
> > correct?
> 
> No.

Would you elaborate?  Is this for the benefit of cross-compiling from
a host with a narrow, say 16 bit, int?

Anyway, it's a bug fixed.  It'll start a whole new raft of
target-specific warnings, though :-(

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Target FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE question
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: Target FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE question
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Re: Target FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE question
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]