Re: high priority bugs T minus 2 days

[<bobbymcn2002 at yahoo dot com>]

One more bug.
i586-pc-cygwn: missing pself.c

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Sidwell" <nathan@codesourcery.com>
To: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Philip Blundell" <philb@gnu.org>; <mark@codesourcery.com>;
<rth@redhat.com>; <rearnsha@arm.com>; <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:37 AM
Subject: high priority bugs T minus 2 days


>
> In the last 24 hours, 7 bugs were closed
> 3050, 3130, 3131, 3132, 3134, 3135, 3146
>
> There are still 15 high priority bugs, however, some of those are new
> and need Mark's say so. The new ones are,
> 3143 mips-elf & mips-rtems unbuildable
> 3145 VTT's (again). I have been working on this and fixed some bugs
> I'll shortly be posting a patch.
> 3147 arm-elf & arm-rtems unbuildable
> 3155 c++ ICE
> 3158 libstdc++ thing
> 3171 some ctor thing, probably mistaken, but I've not checked
>
> the other bugs are
> 761 missing docs, isn't this now complete for 3.0, so can be
> downgraded? Joseph, you seem to be ontop of that one.
> 817 (unassigned) ARM generates out of range accesses
> 2071 (pme) seeking on stdin
> 2866 (unassigned) float->int infinite recursion on h8300
> 2876 (mark) ICE
> 2878 (rearnsha) Philip Blundell has checked in a patch
> (phil, can you close/downgrade the bug report)
> 3037 (rth) arm flow wrong
> 3053 (rth) ARM crash. I tried this, and it appeared to work
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg00794.html
> is that good enough for you?
> 3075 (tromey) This seems to be just about covered now. I have
> confirmed to the list, tom & alexandre. The patch needs
> committing.
>
> nathan
>
> --
> Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery
LLC
>          'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
> nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ :
nathan@acm.org


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com