This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 01:17:45 -0700
- cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
> Should people run the testsuite from these tarballs with 2.95.3, and send
> those results to gcc-testresults?
It certainly won't hurt. It also won't really work in general --
I know that for G++ a lot of the tests will pass/fail for "silly"
reasons. In general, we know that the testsuite performance is
OK relative to 2.95.x because we know that we have only XFAILed
tests that were regressions from GCC 2.95.
I am more interested in people building from the tarballs, and
then running the resulting compiler on whatever code is handy.
Still, what you suggest is not a bad idea.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com