This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE

To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Subject: Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:06:16 -0700
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason_merrill at redhat dot com>, Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010608173954.A3346@redhat.com> <20010607173644.A964@disaster.jaj.com> <20010607155922U.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <20010607180513.A1337@disaster.jaj.com> <20010607163035K.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <20010607183915.A1626@disaster.jaj.com> <20010608173954.A3346@redhat.com> <m3ae3htzh2.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20010611121034.03371c18@mail.lauterbach.com>

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:19:24PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> On the patch itself, how can "-D_GNU_SOURCE %(cpp_cpu)" be correct? 
> Shouldn't that be %(cpp)?

I think you're right.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: G++ defining _GNU_SOURCE
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]