This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
submitting Debian gcc bug reports to gnats (fwd)
- To: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: submitting Debian gcc bug reports to gnats (fwd)
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:00:24 +0200 (CEST)
- cc: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Matthias sent me the following (with express permission to forward this
to the list) in case I consider it relevant.
> The Debian project has its "own" bug database and collects bugs at
> http://bugs.debian.org/. Most gcc related bugs can be found at:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/gcc@packages.debian.org
> http://bugs.debian.org/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
>
> Usually reports were submitted to gcc-bugs@bugs.debian.org, but that's
> not the preferred way anmore, so last weekened I tried to submit bug
> reports. which are not debian specific, to the gcc gnats bug
> system. However before beginning, I want to ask/clarify some things.
>
> - Is it possible to identify all reports, that are forwarded from the
> Debian BTS?. I.e. use a field like 'Submitter-Id: net-debian'
>
> - Should the 'Originator' be the original bug submitter, or the
> Debian BTS? I assume it needs to be a valid email address.
>
> - Additional information can be sent to Debian reports using an email
> address <number>@bugs.debian.org. If a report is forwarded to the
> gcc gnats, it would be convenient to get additional information sent
> to gnats forwarded to the Debian BTS as well. Is it possible to
> register this address as an interested party in the gcc gnats?
I don't know how we could handle the Submitter-Id issue, but the
originator field seems to be similiar to the Sender field in e-mail,
so I'd ouse the address of the Debian BTS there.
If you send the PR from the <number>@bugs.debian.org adddress, responses
will automatically go there as well, and from there the original submitter
will be kept up-to-date, won't she?
That sounds like a useful scenario to me, as far as I understand the
situation.
Gerald