This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ARM port bug

To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
Subject: Re: ARM port bug
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:52:12 -0700
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Denis Chertykov <denisc at overta dot ru>
References: <20010601094534.D18646@redhat.com> <200106011730.SAA14715@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 06:30:32PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>       lfmfd   f4, 1, [sp]!
> 	ldmfd	sp!, {r4, r5, r6, pc}
> 
> We would need to expand this as two insns, one that restored the floating 
> point registers, and one that restored the integer registers *and 
> returned*.

Exactly.  So what's the problem, other than the general
uglyness of representing the load-multiple?



r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ARM port bug
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- Re: ARM port bug
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ARM port bug
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]