This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: compatibility Clarification

To: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Subject: Re: compatibility Clarification
From: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 13:37:27 -0700
CC: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, rth at redhat dot com, aoliva at redhat dot com, madhu dot srinivasan at oracle dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <yddititfvbr.fsf@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <20010522124723M.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <15114.50845.898870.209394@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

Rainer Orth wrote:
> 
> >   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-02/msg01451.html
> >
> > It is certainly bogus to have an explicit declaration of `strlen' like
> > that in libobjc.  This patch is OK.  Do you have write privileges so
> > that you can apply this one?
> 
> No, I don't.  I've contacted Ovidiu Predescu (and gcc-patches) when I
> noticed this patch only went on the trunk, but no reply yet:
> 
>         http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-05/msg01037.html

I'll take care of the branch checkin.

Stan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: compatibility Clarification
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: compatibility Clarification
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: compatibility Clarification
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: compatibility Clarification
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]