This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: compatibility Clarification
- To: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
- Subject: Re: compatibility Clarification
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 12:47:23 -0700
- Cc: aoliva at redhat dot com, madhu dot srinivasan at oracle dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <yddititfvbr.fsf@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Rainer --
Who is the Tru64 maintainer? Or is there one?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-02/msg01448.html
I don't think the autoconf test is worth it here. I *would* just
hard-code the OS numbers for which the -oldas flag is needed. Also,
if we cannot build on V5.0a because of this issue, then we should have
documentation in the installation document for that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-02/msg01451.html
It is certainly bogus to have an explicit declaration of `strlen' like
that in libobjc. This patch is OK. Do you have write privileges so
that you can apply this one?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-03/msg00281.html
Please send mail to libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org. I am sorry that you
haven't gotten a reply yet. Please indicate that this is a regression
from GCC 2.95 as you mention.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-04/msg00213.html
This is OK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-04/msg00607.html
Revise the patch as you suggest and repost it, copying Alexandre Oliva
<aoliva@redhat.com>. Alexandre can approve configuration patches.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com