This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Drop VMS?


    For instance, no one has bothered to update makefile.vms in ages; 

That file will likely be dead, as will all the .com files.

    the configuration parameters are hardwired in vms.h and xm-vms.h, and
    appear to be wrong (this is the stuff that autoconf detects on Unix
    hosts); the pathname parsing code doesn't have a clue how to do VMS
    filename syntax; etc.  But if it's under active maintenance in your
    tree, the problems shouldn't be that hard to resolve.

There are patches around for GCC 2.8.1, but I never put them in because they
needed work.  The best way to sync up is to do it with GCC 3.0 where VMS
will use bash and run configure and that's being actively worked on now,
but no patches are yet available.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]