This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:25:15 -0800
Cc: pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at, jbuck at synopsys dot COM,lucier at math dot purdue dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0102171208310.9194-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20010218102741Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <20010218103424.A14824@valinux.com> <20010218111300O.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 11:13:00AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >>>>> "H" == H J Lu <hjl@valinux.com> writes:
> 
>     H> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-02/msg00605.html
> 
> Sure. 
> 
> The point is that there's no reason to take this up with the GCC
> development team.
> 

All I ask is a well-defined, stable ABI for shared libgcc so that
a shared libgcc from one gcc will work for all versions of gcc. Can
you tell me whom I should contact for my suggestion/request?

Thanks.

H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]