This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:34:24 -0800
Cc: pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at, jbuck at synopsys dot COM,lucier at math dot purdue dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0102171208310.9194-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20010218102741Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 10:27:41AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> If a GNU/Linux distribution wants to change things around, they can.
> They can, for example, put all of libgcc into libc, and then remove
> libgcc entirely!  That is what most system vendors do, and there's no
> reason GNU/Linux vendors shouldn't do it too.  That kind of
> integration and packaging is part of the value added by the
> distributors.
> 

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-02/msg00605.html


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]