This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: g++ 2.95 typeinfo::name()
- To: Jon Cast <jcast at ou dot edu>
- Subject: Re: g++ 2.95 typeinfo::name()
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 23 Jan 2001 03:01:31 +0100
- Cc: Dima Volodin <dvv at egcs dot dvv dot ru>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <NEBBKJPLALAIJFKMPIPPGEKOCEAA.jcast@ou.edu>
Jon Cast <jcast@ou.edu> writes:
| Dima Volodin wrote:
|
| >>And users shouldn't claim the compiler has a bug when it just
| >>implements an implementation-defined semantics the way it thinks
| >>useful for its purposes.
|
| And compiler authors should remember that compilers exist to support users,
| not to give the maintainers something to do.
Nobody is saying the contrary.
| >And adding some "useful semantics" not defined in the standard to
| >standard features is asking for exactly this type of claims.
|
| I'm sorry; maybe I'm missing something. I thought the discussion was about
| a *required* function with undefined semantics.
There was no discussion about undefined semantics.
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com