This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: should libiberty's license be changed from 2 -> 2.1?
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Subject: Re: should libiberty's license be changed from 2 -> 2.1?
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:13:30 -0700
- cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, dj at redhat dot com
- Reply-To: law at redhat dot com
In message <20010119124810.A17767@disaster.jaj.com>you write:
>
> Currently the COPYING.LIB for libiberty is version 2.
>
> The LGPL was rev'd to 2.1 a while ago. The differences are slight and deal
> mostly with shared libraries.
>
> Do we want to use the newer LGPL for libiberty? If so, after the branch?
Files which are already using LGPL should be updated to the most recent
version of the LGPL.
Consider such a patch pre-approved.
jeff