This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.0 Branch and Call For Volunteers
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.0 Branch and Call For Volunteers
- From: McNulty Junior Bobby <bmcnultyjunior at yahoo dot com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:02:05 -0800 (PST)
Where am i supposed to get the GCC 3.0 branch?
--- Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> [ This is long, but please read it! ]
>
> By popular request, let's slush, rather than branch,
> this weekend.
>
> The goals will be:
>
> - Ensure that we can bootstrap on the primary GCC
> 3.0 release
> platforms.
>
> - Ensure that we can bootstrap on the secondary
> platforms, or
> understand why we cannot, and decide it's too
> hard to fix.
>
> - Reduce the overall bug count.
>
> In particular, as of tomorrow (Sunday) night at
> midnight (GMT - 8),
> let's go to the following set of rules:
>
> - All checkins must either:
>
> - Fix a bug that caues incorrect code
> generation, a compiler
> crash, an incorrect error message, or some
> other similarly
> user-visible and vital problem.
>
> - Provide functionality required for the
> release.
>
> For example, since we know we need to improve
> compile-time
> performance, a checkin that did that would be
> acceptable,
> even if it didn't technically fix a bug.
> Similarly,
> documentation improvements, or Makefile
> changes required
> to build on particular platforms, or the like
> would be
> acceptable.
>
> - No checkins shall:
>
> - Add new optimizations
>
> - Improve the code generated by existing
> optimizations
>
> - Implement new language features
>
> - Contain ports to new architectures, not
> already supported
> at this time.
>
> - Contain changes considered likely to be
> substantially
> destabilizing, even if they otherwise meet
> these criteria.
>
> - The usual people can still approve patches, but
> they should use
> these criteria in approving patches.
>
> The goals for these rules are to stabilize the
> current tree in such a
> way as to give us confidence that the code from
> which we branch will
> be sufficiently robust to allow eventual
> stabilization on the branch.
> Once we branch, we will relax these rules, on both
> the branch and the
> mainline.
>
> The termination condition for this state will be one
> of:
>
> - We reach the basic goal of bootstrapping on the
> primary
> and secondary platforms.
>
> - The SC decides it's had enough.
>
> The plan will be to branch on January 21, one week
> from tomorrow.
> However, if we reach the bootstrapping goal earlier
> than that, then
> we can consider branching before that point.
>
> We will need volunteers to bootstrap/test on the
> various platforms. I
> will handle i686-pc-linux-gnu, and mips-sgi-irix6.5.
> If you would
> like to offer your assistance for one of the other
> listed platforms
> at:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html
>
> please send me email privately. Your job will be to
> run bootstraps
> and the regression testsuite throughout the week,
> and let me know the
> current status. Basically, you will send me the the
> output of
> `contrib/test_summary' after performing a bootstrap.
> You can do this
> by simpling saying `contrib/gcc_build checkout build
> test', and in
> fact that is the way in which I would prefer that
> you accumulate this
> data, since it will make things very standard across
> platforms. Do
> not use special --enable or --disable switches
> unless absolutely
> necessary, and do not set BOOT_CFLAGS to non-default
> values. We're
> trying to see that things basically work, not bog
> the mainline down
> indefinitely while testing everything in sight.
>
> If you are interested in a platforms not listed at
> the above web page,
> there is no need to conact me directly. You can
> post your results to
> gcc-bugs, but you should be aware that your
> platform's performance is
> not a direct factor in the branch decision.
>
> We will also need volunteers to help fix bugs. If
> you're an able GCC
> hacker, and can spare some time from other projects,
> please help!
>
> Thanks to all, in advance, for your cooperation, and
> for your help!
>
> --
> Mark Mitchell
> mark@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery, LLC
http://www.codesourcery.com
=====
Robert McNulty Junior
Robert McNulty Junior (C) 2000
email: bmcnultyjunior@yahoo.com
Homepage: http://www.geocities.com/bmcnultyjunior
AIM:bmcnultyjrsap
Featuring Csound compiled with a Win32/Intel Based Compiler