This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GCC 3.0 Branch and Call For Volunteers


Where am i supposed to get the GCC 3.0 branch?

--- Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> 
> [ This is long, but please read it! ]
> 
> By popular request, let's slush, rather than branch,
> this weekend.
> 
> The goals will be:
> 
>   - Ensure that we can bootstrap on the primary GCC
> 3.0 release
>     platforms.
> 
>   - Ensure that we can bootstrap on the secondary
> platforms, or
>     understand why we cannot, and decide it's too
> hard to fix.
> 
>   - Reduce the overall bug count.
> 
> In particular, as of tomorrow (Sunday) night at
> midnight (GMT - 8),
> let's go to the following set of rules:
> 
>   - All checkins must either:
> 
>     - Fix a bug that caues incorrect code
> generation, a compiler
>       crash, an incorrect error message, or some
> other similarly
>       user-visible and vital problem.
> 
>     - Provide functionality required for the
> release.
> 
>       For example, since we know we need to improve
> compile-time
>       performance, a checkin that did that would be
> acceptable,
>       even if it didn't technically fix a bug. 
> Similarly,
>       documentation improvements, or Makefile
> changes required
>       to build on particular platforms, or the like
> would be
>       acceptable.
> 
>   - No checkins shall:
> 
>     - Add new optimizations
> 
>     - Improve the code generated by existing
> optimizations
> 
>     - Implement new language features
> 
>     - Contain ports to new architectures, not
> already supported
>       at this time.
> 
>     - Contain changes considered likely to be
> substantially
>       destabilizing, even if they otherwise meet
> these criteria.
> 
>   - The usual people can still approve patches, but
> they should use
>     these criteria in approving patches.
> 
> The goals for these rules are to stabilize the
> current tree in such a
> way as to give us confidence that the code from
> which we branch will
> be sufficiently robust to allow eventual
> stabilization on the branch.
> Once we branch, we will relax these rules, on both
> the branch and the
> mainline.
> 
> The termination condition for this state will be one
> of:
> 
>   - We reach the basic goal of bootstrapping on the
> primary
>     and secondary platforms.
> 
>   - The SC decides it's had enough.
> 
> The plan will be to branch on January 21, one week
> from tomorrow.
> However, if we reach the bootstrapping goal earlier
> than that, then
> we can consider branching before that point.
> 
> We will need volunteers to bootstrap/test on the
> various platforms.  I
> will handle i686-pc-linux-gnu, and mips-sgi-irix6.5.
>  If you would
> like to offer your assistance for one of the other
> listed platforms
> at:
> 
>   http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html
> 
> please send me email privately.  Your job will be to
> run bootstraps
> and the regression testsuite throughout the week,
> and let me know the
> current status.  Basically, you will send me the the
> output of
> `contrib/test_summary' after performing a bootstrap.
>  You can do this
> by simpling saying `contrib/gcc_build checkout build
> test', and in
> fact that is the way in which I would prefer that
> you accumulate this
> data, since it will make things very standard across
> platforms.  Do
> not use special --enable or --disable switches
> unless absolutely
> necessary, and do not set BOOT_CFLAGS to non-default
> values.  We're
> trying to see that things basically work, not bog
> the mainline down
> indefinitely while testing everything in sight.
> 
> If you are interested in a platforms not listed at
> the above web page,
> there is no need to conact me directly.  You can
> post your results to
> gcc-bugs, but you should be aware that your
> platform's performance is
> not a direct factor in the branch decision.
> 
> We will also need volunteers to help fix bugs.  If
> you're an able GCC
> hacker, and can spare some time from other projects,
> please help!
> 
> Thanks to all, in advance, for your cooperation, and
> for your help!
> 
> --
> Mark Mitchell                  
> mark@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery, LLC              
http://www.codesourcery.com


=====
Robert McNulty Junior
Robert McNulty Junior (C) 2000
email: bmcnultyjunior@yahoo.com
Homepage: http://www.geocities.com/bmcnultyjunior
AIM:bmcnultyjrsap
Featuring Csound compiled with a Win32/Intel Based Compiler

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]