This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joseph S. Myers [mailto:jsm28@cam.ac.uk]

>> Well, if you feel that '-std' is a better name than '-iso' then that
>> is OK with me. But, IMNHO there ought be a way to suppress GNU extensions
>> without requiring esoteric command lines.  It is about practicality.
>
>I'm not saying that such an option should not be provided - but that it
>would get misused for warm feelings about portability as much as it would
>get properly used as a shortcut by users who know what standard version it
>refers to with their compiler and are familiar with its limitations.

  I'm always in favour of giving users enough rope to hang themselves if
that's really what they want to do.  I get annoyed with software from M$
and Apple that patronizes me by trying to hide technical details of what's
actually going on (eg. 'there has been an error but I won't tell you what'
sort of messages, or M$ email software trying to hide those scary strings
of characters with @ and . in them behind a user-friendly screen name),
and if people want to fumble around in the dark by trying to adhere to a
standard that they don't actually have hardcopy of, that's their business.

  As to how the flag should be named, what about "-std=latest" ?

      DaveK
-- 
The Boulder Pledge: "Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything 
offered to me as the result of an unsolicited email message. Nor will I 
forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large 
numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online
community." 


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]