This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc snapshots -vs- java libraries
- To: "Tim Prince" <tprince at computer dot org>
- Subject: Re: gcc snapshots -vs- java libraries
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 14 Dec 2000 05:58:57 +0100
- Cc: <law at redhat dot com>, "Bryce McKinlay" <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <8717.976748337@upchuck> <00b601c06587$ec5e7ea0$9865fea9@intel9txl52pzr>
"Tim Prince" <tprince@computer.org> writes:
| > In message <3A37FF5E.8041334D@albatross.co.nz>you write:
| > > It looks like the java libs are going into the gcc-core archive on
| the
| > > snapshots page. Shouldn't zlib, fastjar, boehm-gc, libffi, and
| libjava
| > > be put into the gcc-java archive instead?
| > Yes. The snapshot script needs some updates to account for the
| > integration of libgcj stuff.
| > jeff
|
| Is the build of libgcj intended to be mandatory regardless of whether
| java is built? Likewise, for libstdc++-v3 without c++? I'd prefer to
| be able to build languages one at a time and test just the ones which
| are building successfully.
Agreed. One should not get Java libs built when one didn't configure
for Java. Likewise for C++.
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com