This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc snapshots -vs- java libraries
- To: <law at redhat dot com>, "Bryce McKinlay" <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Subject: Re: gcc snapshots -vs- java libraries
- From: "Tim Prince" <tprince at computer dot org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 20:39:59 -0800
- Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <8717.976748337@upchuck>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey A Law" <law@redhat.com>
To: "Bryce McKinlay" <bryce@albatross.co.nz>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: gcc snapshots -vs- java libraries
>
> In message <3A37FF5E.8041334D@albatross.co.nz>you write:
> > It looks like the java libs are going into the gcc-core archive on
the
> > snapshots page. Shouldn't zlib, fastjar, boehm-gc, libffi, and
libjava
> > be put into the gcc-java archive instead?
> Yes. The snapshot script needs some updates to account for the
> integration of libgcj stuff.
> jeff
Is the build of libgcj intended to be mandatory regardless of whether
java is built? Likewise, for libstdc++-v3 without c++? I'd prefer to
be able to build languages one at a time and test just the ones which
are building successfully.