This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd)

To: zackw at stanford dot edu
Subject: Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd)
From: Richard Stallman <rms at gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 21:54:23 -0700 (MST)
CC: amylaar at redhat dot com, neilb at earthling dot net, per at bothner dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gerd at gnu dot org, pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at, jbuck at racerx dot synopsys dot com, rms at gnu dot org
References: <20001122184332.A29542@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <200011222013.eAMKDnP04082@tantra.cygnus.co.uk> <20001122122653.D820@wolery.stanford.edu>
Reply-to: rms at gnu dot org

    See my other post.  The traditional preprocessor is not intended to be
    feature compatible with 2.95.

It ought to be feature-compatible, in general, aside from
the specific case that must work differently in order
to make particular traditional constructs function.

References:
- Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd)
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd)
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd)
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]