This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GNU Fortran 90?

To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
Subject: Re: GNU Fortran 90?
From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
Date: 16 Nov 2000 13:46:21 -0800
CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <3A11B646.8B8ED3D6@apple.com> <3A11BE3C.C03A8C65@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <3A11F371.D8026495@apple.com> <3A12E285.82A206D7@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20001115153832.L8418@wolery.stanford.edu> <3A144294.D8BF0BD9@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>

Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> writes:

> So from my point of view it could well be that automatic vectorisation
> is added to GCC before g77 is removed.  In that case g77 would benefit
> from this as well...

More to the point, automatic vectorisation will benefit Fortran 77
code (and F90/F95 code that doesn't use the vectorization primitives),
no matter which frontend it's compiled with.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>

References:
- GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Toon Moene

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]