This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GNU Fortran 90?

To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
Subject: Re: GNU Fortran 90?
From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at stanford dot edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 15:38:32 -0800
Cc: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <3A11B646.8B8ED3D6@apple.com> <3A11BE3C.C03A8C65@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <3A11F371.D8026495@apple.com> <3A12E285.82A206D7@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>

On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:22:45PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
> 
> This means that to be able to use AltiVec, we have to build a
> vectorising pass into the middle-end of GCC (and then g77 code would
> profit as well).

I hope you are not still intending to keep g77 around after g95 is
complete.

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Toon Moene

References:
- GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: GNU Fortran 90?
  - From: Toon Moene

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]