Re: Release criteria status

[Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>]

>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Buck <jbuck@racerx.synopsys.com> writes:

    >> The nice thing about TeXinfo is the ability to generate lots of
    >> different formats from it, including books that the FSF
    >> sometimes sells.  I would therefore like to keep the users
    >> guide in TeXinfo, unless we hear otherwise from the FSF.
    >> However, I think basic installation information is best
    >> presented via HTML, and since that's what people seem to be
    >> most comfortable with, let's go with it.

    Joe> Don't forget about texi2html -- the advantage of having the

I didn't, really...  If Gerald thinks more people will write HTML, and
we're only talking about the installation documents, that seems OK to
me.

Do you disagree?  If so, I could be persuaded -- I actually prefer to
write Texinfo than raw HTML.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com