This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- From: Richard Stallman <rms at gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 15:59:37 -0700 (MST)
- CC: dstarner98 at aasaa dot ofe dot org, kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <14729.973131786@upchuck>
- Reply-to: rms at gnu dot org
And the GNAT for Linux folks.
What an ironic name for a project. When they say "Linux", they must
really mean the GNU/Linux system. But GNAT itself is supposed to
exist *for* the GNU system (which includes GNU/Linux).
So if there is a need for an outside project to work on GNAT to get it
to work well in GNU/Linux, does that mean the standard GNAT is not
paying enough attention to the system it is part of?