This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- To: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 22:01:03 -0700
- cc: mrs at windriver dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, rth at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at redhat dot com
In message <20001102043245.C6D5334DAF@nile.gnat.com>you write:
> <<First, you don't get to complain, if you haven't contributed a single
> testcase that measures performance. After you donate one, then you
> can. After you show us all how it's done, then we can follow your
> lead. I think it is trivial:
> >>
>
> Well I think you need to establish a performance testing framework, and
> that's not as easy as it sounds. Constructing individual tests is not
> that hard, and indeed in some cases the tests already exist, e.g. the
> PIWG tests for Ada, and Spec tests for C.
Certainly. And I think you'll start seeing some of that kind of infrastructure
being built out in the not too distant future.
jeff