This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, law at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 23:27:53 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, rms at gnu dot org,rth at cygnus dot com, shebs at apple dot com
<<Why don't you read the GCC 3.0 release criteria?
>>
That does not really address what I was talking about, which is not
establishing some gating release criteria, but rather setting up
continued development procedures and testing regimens that ensure that
performance is *always* being considered. Performance is not an
add-on feature :-)