Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?

[dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)]

<< don't know why as many emails about this matter have flown by.  All
he technical problems, have technical solutions.  If your message
oesn't have a technical problem, or a technical solution to a
iscussed problem, let's hold back on those emails.  After Ada is
ntegrated, and chugging away, then we can address the next round of
ssues, like please update more often, please check in code to our
ree first, who is gonna play in my code, why aren't you testing our
ree...  We can't have those problems, until after we get part the
irst one.
>>

That makes good sense to me. And that's what we are aiming at as 
quickly as possible. I think that if Jeff has remaining concerns,
they will make much more sense in the context of what is actually
happening rather than what anyone imagines MIGHT happen :-)