This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

*more* alignment problems



I spoke too soon.

Maybe for a change this extensive you should have bootstrapped more than
just one target.

What unit is ALIGN supposed to have for store_field?  In at least one
case it's being called with alignment in bits.

That value gets passed to store_bit_field which expects alignment in bytes
according to its comment.

The mis-match is causing 931110-1.c to fail execution because we do a
mis-aligned store.

jeff





Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]