This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Anyone want another `make check'er?
On Mon, 5 October 1998, 14:04:15, nix@esperi.demon.co.uk wrote:
> Manfred Hollstein writes:
> > On Sun, 4 October 1998, 00:55:45, nix-egcs@esperi.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > BOOT_CFLAGS="-O9 -funroll-all-loops -g -march=pentium -mcpu=pentium -fomit-frame-pointer"
> >
> > and
> >
> > "-O9 -march=pentium -mcpu=pentium -fomit-frame-pointer -g"
> >
> > for both CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS?!
>
> Hmm. As a matter of interest, why unroll-all-loops on the BOOT_CFLAGS
> and not on the CFLAGS themselves? Are you trying to test egcs's
> ability to bootstrap itself as well?
Yes, that's exactly what I'm trying to do.
> (btw, I'll probably be using
> egcs-1.1b from the release tarball for bootstrapping, at least until I
> get the time to grab the 1.1 tree from CVS.)
That's fine.
>
> I'll be adding --{enable,disable}-haifa to the configure lines as
> well, of course.
>
Sure.
>
> [1] similar enough for `diff' to be of some vague use, if possible...
> ... why? you never know. It could prove useful in the end.
>
> --
> `Suppose I manufacture band-aids. I sell them under the following
> license: "Buyer agrees to apply product only to his or her own body."'
> - Axel Boldt on commercial software licenses
manfred