This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Anyone want another `make check'er?
Manfred Hollstein writes:
> On Sun, 4 October 1998, 00:55:45, nix-egcs@esperi.demon.co.uk wrote:
>
> > I'm in a position to run nightly -Wall compiles and `make check's over
> > the latest egcs CVS tree, on an i586-pc-linux-gnu box. It occurs to me
> > that as Manfred is doing such a good job running tests on this box
> Thanks for the compliment ;-)
That's OK. I plan to make my reports look vaguely similar to yours,
too[1]. I need to pull down the dejagnu ICE patch and get the scripts
written and then I'm set.
> BOOT_CFLAGS="-O9 -funroll-all-loops -g -march=pentium -mcpu=pentium -fomit-frame-pointer"
>
> and
>
> "-O9 -march=pentium -mcpu=pentium -fomit-frame-pointer -g"
>
> for both CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS?!
Hmm. As a matter of interest, why unroll-all-loops on the BOOT_CFLAGS
and not on the CFLAGS themselves? Are you trying to test egcs's
ability to bootstrap itself as well? (btw, I'll probably be using
egcs-1.1b from the release tarball for bootstrapping, at least until I
get the time to grab the 1.1 tree from CVS.)
I'll be adding --{enable,disable}-haifa to the configure lines as
well, of course.
[1] similar enough for `diff' to be of some vague use, if possible...
... why? you never know. It could prove useful in the end.
--
`Suppose I manufacture band-aids. I sell them under the following
license: "Buyer agrees to apply product only to his or her own body."'
- Axel Boldt on commercial software licenses