This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: No Fortran

To: egcs at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: No Fortran
From: Dave Love <d dot love at dl dot ac dot uk>
Date: 13 Sep 1998 12:58:16 +0100
References: <Pine.GSO.4.03.9809120241420.11674-100000@nashira.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

>>>>> "GP" == Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

 GP> libf2c, I mean? I've been wondering why we compile that for "c
 GP> c++", too. Would a patch that only builds libf2c if "g77" is
 GP> built as well be accepted?

Perhaps it could treat C++ runtime on the same basis.  (I'm not sure
if it's still the case, but g++ used to be built regardless of
LANGUAGES.)

References:
- Re: No Fortran
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]