This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
On February 13, 2018 6:51:29 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:Hi! On the following testcase, we recurse infinitely, because we have float re-association enabled, but also rounding-math, so we try to optimize (cst1 + cst2) + cst3 as (cst2 + cst3) + cst1 but (cst2 + cst3) doesn't simplify and we try again and optimize it as (cst3 + cst1) + cst2 and then (cst1 + cst2) + cst3 and so on forever. If @0 is not a CONSTANT_CLASS_P, there is not a problem, if it is, the code just checks if we can actually simplify the operation between cst2 and cst3 into a constant.Is there a reason to try simplifying at all for constant @0?
Yes. cst2+cst3 might simplify (the operation happens to be exact and not require rounding), which leaves us with only one addition instead of 2.
On the other hand, mixing -frounding-math with reassociation seems strange to me, and likely not worth optimizing for.
-- Marc Glisse
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |