This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH,DWARF,v2] AIX dwarf2out label fix
- From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:27:29 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH,DWARF,v2] AIX dwarf2out label fix
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGWvnynLjij7d2Led0mhTGcK=cYEfXyRmRy6gx9CG7EX-QA7GA@mail.gmail.com> <bb98e3a4-cd62-3733-0844-4235fdd55d88@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/18/2017 06:00 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>> This version adds a macro DWARF_INITIAL_LENGTH_SIZE_STR based on
>> DWARF_OFFSET_SIZE to define the string expression to append to the
>> label to correct the offset.
>>
>> Because AIX Assembler inserts the section length, the section label
>> generated by GCC points to the wrong location and must be adjusted
>> when referenced in DW_AT_stmt_list.
>>
>> + char dl_section_label[MAX_ARTIFICIAL_LABEL_BYTES];
>
> It seems inaccurate to call this variable "label" when it's a label name
> minus offset. Maybe dl_section_ref?
Hi, Jason
Thanks for taking a look at this!
Any naming suggestions are appreciated -- I was trying to choose a
short variable name. dl_section_ref is fine with me.
>
>> if (debug_info_level >= DINFO_LEVEL_TERSE)
>> add_AT_lineptr (ctnode->root_die, DW_AT_stmt_list,
>> (!dwarf_split_debug_info
>> - ? debug_line_section_label
>> + ? dl_section_label
>> : debug_skeleton_line_section_label));
>
>
> Doesn't debug_skeleton_line_section_label need the same offset?
AIX doesn't support DWARF split debug info, so it did not seem
worthwhile to clutter the code. I am trying to make the minimal
changes for AIX's peculiar DWARF implementation.
Thanks, David