This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Add RejectNegative for a c option.
- From: Martin Liška <mliska at suse dot cz>
- To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: jason at redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:38:35 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add RejectNegative for a c option.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <e9bcf468-9f04-3146-d8b4-3fac2e5ed4e9@suse.cz> <5862B05F.6050903@codesourcery.com>
On 12/27/2016 07:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 12/27/2016 09:26 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Without RejectNegative one can cause an ICE in the compiler.
>> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>>
>> Ready to be installed?
>> Martin
>
> Any chance you can also fix the manual to fully document the
> -fstrong-eval-order= form of the option? It doesn't currently list
> that or what the possible enum values are. I assume
> -fno-strong-eval-order is a synonym for -fstrong-eval-order=none ?
>
> -Sandra
>
Hello.
I've just installed the patch. To be honest, I'm not familiar with the option,
I guess Jason would be the right person to add documentation entry for the that.
As I've read other options allowing 'none' value, all of them have RejectNegative
flag set and do not allow synonyms.
Thanks,
Martin