This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC, PR68580] Handle pthread_create error in tsan testsuite
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>
- Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com>, Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries at mentor dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google dot com>, "thread-sanitizer at googlegroups dot com" <thread-sanitizer at googlegroups dot com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:22:34 -0800
- Subject: Re: [RFC, PR68580] Handle pthread_create error in tsan testsuite
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <HE1PR07MB090529F0173D75A4621D5FD6E4AC0 at HE1PR07MB0905 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <56C1AC43 dot 4070309 at mentor dot com>,<CACT4Y+b0nXH3NWhWHiaMt_M82kUuMckOnehY1DsOJ9d=4qi0Ug at mail dot gmail dot com> <HE1PR07MB0905578859D3EC1C8AFFD5CFE4AC0 at HE1PR07MB0905 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com>
On Feb 15, 2016, at 3:29 AM, Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> wrote:
> And independently of that I am looking at using llvm's test.h framework instead
> of gcc's test_barrier.h for gcc-7 soon.
Here’s to hoping that we don’t back slide on:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00436.html
Did they ever adopt a reliable scheme to test?