This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi! Ping. On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:03:48 +0100, I wrote: > Ping. > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:31:56 +0100, I wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:13:07 +0100 (CET), Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > If C/C++ array section reductions have non-zero (positive) bias, it is > > > > implemented by declaring a smaller private array and subtracting the bias > > > > from the start of the private array (because valid code may only dereference > > > > elements from bias onwards). But, this isn't something that is kosher in > > > > C/C++ pointer arithmetics and the alias oracle seems to get upset on that. > > > > So, the following patch fixes that by performing the subtraction on integral > > > > type instead of p+ -bias. > > > > > > So this still does use the biased pointer because you do not > > > re-write accesses (where you could have applied the biasing to > > > the indexes / offsets), right? Thus the patch is merely obfuscation > > > for GCC rather than making it kosher for C/C++ (you still have a > > > pointer pointing outside of the private array object)? > > > > > > I still hope to have a look where the alias oracle gets things > > > wrong (well, if so by accident at least). > > > > I understand this ("have a look where the alias oracle gets things > > wrong") to have happened in Richi's trunk r230793, > > <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221#c5>? > > > > I've tested that with the original POINTER_PLUS_EXPR code restored and > > with Richi's r230793 applied, for x86_64 GNU/Linux there is no change for > > the libgomp.c/reduction-11.c, libgomp.c/reduction-12.c, > > libgomp.c++/reduction-11.C, libgomp.c++/reduction-12.C test cases > > (already PASSed), but for 32-bit x86, they now PASS instead of FAILing. > > That is, I tested with the following (part of r230672) reverted: > > > > > > --- gcc/omp-low.c.jj 2015-11-20 12:56:17.000000000 +0100 > > > > +++ gcc/omp-low.c 2015-11-20 13:44:29.080374051 +0100 > > > > @@ -4444,11 +4444,13 @@ lower_rec_input_clauses (tree clauses, g > > > > > > > > if (!integer_zerop (bias)) > > > > { > > > > - bias = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, sizetype, bias); > > > > - bias = fold_build1_loc (clause_loc, NEGATE_EXPR, > > > > - sizetype, bias); > > > > - x = fold_build2_loc (clause_loc, POINTER_PLUS_EXPR, > > > > - TREE_TYPE (x), x, bias); > > > > + bias = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, pointer_sized_int_node, > > > > + bias); > > > > + yb = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, pointer_sized_int_node, > > > > + x); > > > > + yb = fold_build2_loc (clause_loc, MINUS_EXPR, > > > > + pointer_sized_int_node, yb, bias); > > > > + x = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, TREE_TYPE (x), yb); > > > > yb = create_tmp_var (ptype, name); > > > > gimplify_assign (yb, x, ilist); > > > > x = yb; > > > > OK to commit the following to trunk? > > > > commit 92b0eebfcbe914d3addeb97d4bb33f76a44dbe60 > > Author: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com> > > Date: Thu Nov 26 14:21:13 2015 +0100 > > > > Restore original POINTER_PLUS_EXPR code > > > > PR middle-end/68221 > > gcc/ > > * omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses): If C/C++ array reduction > > has non-zero bias, use pointer plus of negated bias instead of > > subtracting it in integer type. > > --- > > gcc/omp-low.c | 12 +++++------- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git gcc/omp-low.c gcc/omp-low.c > > index 0b44588..927d9d9 100644 > > --- gcc/omp-low.c > > +++ gcc/omp-low.c > > @@ -4451,13 +4451,11 @@ lower_rec_input_clauses (tree clauses, gimple_seq *ilist, gimple_seq *dlist, > > > > if (!integer_zerop (bias)) > > { > > - bias = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, pointer_sized_int_node, > > - bias); > > - yb = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, pointer_sized_int_node, > > - x); > > - yb = fold_build2_loc (clause_loc, MINUS_EXPR, > > - pointer_sized_int_node, yb, bias); > > - x = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, TREE_TYPE (x), yb); > > + bias = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, sizetype, bias); > > + bias = fold_build1_loc (clause_loc, NEGATE_EXPR, > > + sizetype, bias); > > + x = fold_build2_loc (clause_loc, POINTER_PLUS_EXPR, > > + TREE_TYPE (x), x, bias); > > yb = create_tmp_var (ptype, name); > > gimplify_assign (yb, x, ilist); > > x = yb; GrÃÃe Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |