This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, c] PR c/48956: diagnostics for conversions involving complex types
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>,Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>,Mikhail Maltsev <maltsevm at gmail dot com>,GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 21:36:20 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, c] PR c/48956: diagnostics for conversions involving complex types
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20141229174555 dot 79e9defd at debian-miyuki> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1501300010300 dot 14904 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <6F9F1701-C4DF-4307-8508-2A63C74916C4 at comcast dot net> <CA+=Sn1kMbxyOWXNbHbLdV-a45uZhmWdORkeydyVTVFqGuz539Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <0089F060-8AF4-4A68-8348-27CC9491BE40 at comcast dot net>
On January 30, 2015 5:33:43 PM CET, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Jan 29, 2015, at 7:16 PM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
>wrote:
>>> On Jan 29, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
>wrote:
>>>> The patch is OK for GCC 6
>>>
>>> We will be releasing 5.x compilers for the next decade?! Does he
>really have to wait 10 years?
>>>
>>> Why not, just OK for stage 1?
>>
>> You missed the memo on the versioning scheme change. GCC 5.1 is
>going
>> to the first released version of GCC 5. GCC 5.2 will be the next
>> patched version of GCC 5. GCC 6 is the next major release of GCC.
>
>Ah, I kinda discounted that as it went by it seems. It seems most
>other players go the other way, as the numbers get large, the first one
>fixes, and then they add numbers at the bottom. Thanks.
You obviously missed the Marketing 101 course ;)
Richard.