This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 31671


On 10/10/2013 03:31 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/10/2013 08:26 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/10/2013 08:33 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+          expr_type = TREE_TYPE (expr) = cp_build_qualified_type
+        (TREE_TYPE (expr), cp_type_quals (TREE_TYPE (probe_type)));

Won't that end up being the same as the contents of expr_type before
this statement?  Can we just remove this assignment?

Sorry. Having figured out where the problem was, I messed up very badly
when I prepared the actual patch for submission. The below makes much
more sense to me.

+	      expr_type = TREE_TYPE (probe_type);

Again, won't that set expr_type to the value it already had? I'd prefer to just have a comment that we're leaving it alone.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]