This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 10/10/2013 03:31 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/10/2013 08:26 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:On 10/10/2013 08:33 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:+ expr_type = TREE_TYPE (expr) = cp_build_qualified_type + (TREE_TYPE (expr), cp_type_quals (TREE_TYPE (probe_type)));Won't that end up being the same as the contents of expr_type before this statement? Can we just remove this assignment?
Sorry. Having figured out where the problem was, I messed up very badly when I prepared the actual patch for submission. The below makes much more sense to me.
+ expr_type = TREE_TYPE (probe_type);
Again, won't that set expr_type to the value it already had? I'd prefer to just have a comment that we're leaving it alone.
Jason
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |