This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi all, This patch fixes a PR that was exposed in the recent jump table reorganisation. We should use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn in the jump table handling code. This fixes the incorrect assembly generation that we get when building newlib for aarch64. Tested aarch64-none-elf. A testcase to gcc.dg is added with the separate arm patch. Ok for trunk? Thanks, Kyrill gcc/ChangeLog 2013-04-03 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> PR target/56809 * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (is_jump_table): Use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn.
Attachment:
pr56809_aarch64.patch
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |