This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch/RFC] PR 55951

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:32:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch/RFC] PR 55951
References: <51519007 dot 9010708 at oracle dot com>

On 03/26/2013 08:09 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

check_array_designated_initializer is called by reshape_init* with
ce->index a CONST_DECL, not an INTEGER_CST. Thus I wondered if in such
cases it's just matter of using integral_constant_value on it, thus
something like the below (which passes testing on x86_64-linux).

Any constant-expression can go there, so I think I'd usecxx_constant_value unconditionally.


Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch/RFC] PR 55951
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [C++ Patch/RFC] PR 55951
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]