This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [mips] fix $gp restore bug
- From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- To: Adam Nemet <anemet at caviumnetworks dot com>
- Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:52:28 +0100
- Subject: Re: [mips] fix $gp restore bug
- References: <49870BD7.8050707@codesourcery.com> <87iqnswrzu.fsf@firetop.home> <4987F33C.1060408@codesourcery.com> <8763jrcmdo.fsf@firetop.home> <87r61fli49.fsf@firetop.home> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0903022352330.18052@ftp.linux-mips.org> <o7zlg3o17c.fsf@ropi.home> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0903031037310.18052@ftp.linux-mips.org> <18861.21372.902140.780295@ropi.home> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0903051153050.18052@ftp.linux-mips.org> <18864.222.258830.920265@ropi.home> <87sklrskee.fsf@firetop.home> <18864.56135.151151.775345@ropi.home> <87eiqrkd3e.fsf@firetop.home> <CAEXCH01QtgTIFprhMO000003d8@caexch01.caveonetworks.com> <871vmazjjr.fsf@firetop.home> <19118.34619.82795.313357@ropi.home>
Adam Nemet <anemet@caviumnetworks.com> writes:
> Just another minor question. In the "big comment" you reshuffled the order of
> the points. Previously they had been close to order in the pass pipeline.
> Was this intentional?
Yeah. I thought there were too many forward references.
> I think the old was probably easier to follow.
OK, I switched it back, but put the EH_USES stuff at (2) (which is
more strictly pass order than the first one). Applied.
Richard