This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA:] PR37170, extern weak broken, like for gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c

From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
To: Rafael Espindola <espindola at google dot com>
Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>, richard dot guenther at gmail dot com, pinskia at gmail dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dnovillo at google dot com
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 14:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [RFA:] PR37170, extern weak broken, like for gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c
References: <38a0d8450809020634v2fdd7484h9176ee893739c8f5@mail.gmail.com> <200809021353.m82Dr79p023742@ignucius.se.axis.com> <38a0d8450809020741m45184521p59ed8be5e61561ce@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Rafael Espindola wrote:
> You asked me to try to remove the FE calls. Since I suspected these
> (the c++ ones) were causing problems on LTO, I tried.

Yes, good work.

> I don't really think it is reasonable for me to go looking for a
> hppa-hpux machine just to test this. If you care about it all that
> much, test it yourself.

You got it wrong.  I was pointing out a flaw with your testing;
it's like testing the math library with a fprintf of integers.
Ask for testers, it works!

(Looks like mine finally got through the needles eye, yay!
Thanks David Anglin!)

brgds, H-P

References:
- Re: [RFA:] PR37170, extern weak broken, like for gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c
  - From: Rafael Espindola
- Re: [RFA:] PR37170, extern weak broken, like for gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: [RFA:] PR37170, extern weak broken, like for gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c
  - From: Rafael Espindola

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]