Re: [RFA:] PR37170, extern weak broken, like for gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c

["Rafael Espindola" <espindola at google dot com>]

> I'm not that surprised.  I strongly suggest you test on
> hppa-hpux; I don't think any of the mentioned systems require
> extern declarations.  And the patch that needs to go in before
> is <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16169> (take
> 6) which for lack of hppa-hpux results hasn't been posted to
> gcc-patches yet.  I hereby retract
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg02037.html> (which
> was take 6).

You asked me to try to remove the FE calls. Since I suspected these
(the c++ ones) were causing problems on LTO, I tried.

I don't really think it is reasonable for me to go looking for a
hppa-hpux machine just to test this. If you care about it all that
much, test it yourself.

Since these call are not the cause of the problems on lto, I really
don't care all that much if it gets include now or not. It would be
sad for the patch to be reject. Should we make it a policy that
everyone should test on hpux? What about s390?

I am building mpfr on the darwin machine now. No idea how long it will
take for 3 bootstraps and 3 regression tests.

> brgds, H-P
>

Cheers,
-- 
Rafael Avila de Espindola

Google | Gordon House | Barrow Street | Dublin 4 | Ireland
Registered in Dublin, Ireland | Registration Number: 368047