This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [fortran patch] Don't use TREE_LISTs for storing arguments to intrinsic functions
- From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: Brooks Moses <brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "Lee Millward" <lee dot millward at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:26:51 +0200
- Subject: Re: [fortran patch] Don't use TREE_LISTs for storing arguments to intrinsic functions
- References: <4663B7A0.8050802@codesourcery.com> <9784d3ab0705071520k1f0c1563ib16810e65852924a@mail.gmail.com> <46402258.5030706@codesourcery.com> <4.3.1.2.20070508112105.03cdc938@cits1.stanford.edu> <4.3.1.2.20070508122850.029d3820@cits1.stanford.edu> <9784d3ab0705081537jcb70109g962f91caf5c6ca97@mail.gmail.com> <46411641.8070206@codesourcery.com> <9784d3ab0705101534x2c7849eeh93e03afc7bda71d7@mail.gmail.com> <4643A623.6000706@codesourcery.com> <9784d3ab0705271210l5c836055wf01b439ff2a2ac23@mail.gmail.com> <4663B7A0.8050802@codesourcery.com> <4.3.1.2.20070604112111.02f91f08@cits1.stanford.edu>
Would you mind if I committed it, then? I'd prefer to get this
into the tree sooner, rather than having to worry about bit-rot
(especially since FX is working on a patch in the same area).
I'm already on it! Currently regtesting, will commit later tonight.
FX