This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: patches pending review November-January


"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez@gmail.com> writes:

| On 01 Feb 2007 11:45:47 -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@cs.tamu.edu> wrote:
| > "Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez@gmail.com> writes:
| >
| > [...]
| >
| > | Anyway, thanks for your comments. It is encouraging that at least
| > | someone replied. Thanks.
| >
| > some of us who should be replying are trying to find appropriate time,
| > since feedbacks on this matter tend to quickly get argumentative.
| 
| Gabriel, my comment had no second-meaning (does this make sense in
| English?), it was not directed to anyone,  it was not ironic, nor
| sarcastic. 

Thanks for the clarification.

[...]

| I am looking forward to your comments in this particular issue and any
| other of the patches mentioned in my list and about the Wextra digest.
| I understand this is no priority at all and you surely have many other
| things more important to do than this. It is fine. No hurry. But,
| please, don't take it personal every time I "ping" about them. I

I don't take it personnaly.  It it good that you take the patience to ping.
It is a priority to improve GCC diagnostics, it just happens that
there are many priorities. 


As of Dirk's comment.  I believe I've already stated my concerns
about the multiplication of switches.  It is just that I need some time
to suggest alternatives to work out.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]