This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Dominator opts fixes and enhancements

On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 10:11, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 10:06, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> 
> > So I assume that when dealing with multple entry points, all the entry
> > points are going to use the same default defintion, right?
> > 
> I doubt we can deal with multiple entry points at the moment (flowgraph
> mainly), but if we coud, then yes, all the entry points would have the
> same default def.
> 

Why not? Aren't the multiple entry points just successors to ENTRY_BLOCK
as far as the CFG cares?  Doesnt not handling it make some fortran
tricky to compile? :-)  

Andrew
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]