This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Dominator opts fixes and enhancements


On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 10:19, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

> Why not? Aren't the multiple entry points just successors to ENTRY_BLOCK
> as far as the CFG cares?  Doesnt not handling it make some fortran
> tricky to compile? :-)  
> 
We do not build the tree CFG with multiple entry points in mind.  So,
ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR always has exactly one successor: basic block 0.

I'm not even sure that multiple entry points are supported by the RTL
optimizers.  I seem to remember discussions about that in the lists or
IRC, but my memory is hazy.

Yes, it's a bug :)


Diego.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]