This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [TestCase] PR C++/11384



On Thursday, Jul 17, 2003, at 19:07 US/Eastern, Andrew Pinski wrote:


On Thursday, Jul 17, 2003, at 02:32 US/Eastern, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:

| This test was failing on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 for some reason (I
| could not find the patch which fixed this or broke it).
| Ok?

Yes.

Woops, I should have looked more. Actually this was already a test (g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static3.C). What do you think we should do? Move the xfail from that test into the new test and remove the old test as it is in g++.old-deja or something else?

Actually they are two different tests but since it looks like the new test
will not work without weak symbols should I add the xfail from the other test?


Thanks,
Andrew pinski


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]