This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [TestCase] PR C++/11384
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Jul 2003 09:20:52 +0200
- Subject: Re: [TestCase] PR C++/11384
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <40759874-B8AC-11D7-BF21-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>
Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
| On Thursday, Jul 17, 2003, at 19:07 US/Eastern, Andrew Pinski wrote:
|
| > On Thursday, Jul 17, 2003, at 02:32 US/Eastern, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >
| >> Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
| >>
| >> | This test was failing on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 for some reason (I
| >> | could not find the patch which fixed this or broke it).
| >> | Ok?
| >>
| >> Yes.
| >
| > Woops, I should have looked more.
| > Actually this was already a test (g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static3.C).
| > What do you think we should do?
| > Move the xfail from that test into the new test and remove the old
| > test as it is in g++.old-deja or something else?
|
| Actually they are two different tests but since it looks like the new
| test
| will not work without weak symbols should I add the xfail from the
| other test?
Yes.
Thank you.
-- Gaby