This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR optimization/11210

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at tuliptree dot org>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 29 Jun 2003 01:16:22 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR optimization/11210
References: <200306181758.44010.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr><200306281459.58185.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr><1056867316.1019.10.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org> <200306290951.08956.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 00:51, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> This patch is not correct either (it was the first thing I tried and it 
> caused a bootstrap failure on x86): it turns every comparison on unsigned 
> bitfields into a signed comparison. Thus

Yes, my patch doesn't work.  I am looking into this so I can understand
why Eric's second patch does work.  Meanwhile, if someone wants to
revert Eric's first patch to get a working toolchain again that is OK
with me.

Jim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR optimization/11210
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

References:
- [PATCH] Fix PR optimization/11210
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR optimization/11210
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR optimization/11210
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR optimization/11210
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]