This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH]: Updated fix for debug/7081
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:54:27 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >> > As someone pointed out, i could also move CLASSTYPE_DECLARED_CLASS to
> >> > tree.h, and use that macro instead (making it use a different bit).
> >>
> >> I guess this is ok. I'd prefer a C++ person ack it as well.
>
> > I'm actually not fond of it myself, but i can't think of another way to
> > do it.
>
> We could also use a langhook. I think I might prefer that, actually.
Hmmmm.
Good point.
Should the C++ FE decide what to tag it with, or just tell me whether it's
a class or struct?
>
> > We could always just punt on it and mark 7081 as wontfix.
>
> I'd be OK with that, too.
>
> Jason
>